THE OIL RIG FIRE IN THE MEXICAN
GULF







Oil Rig’s Siren Was Kept
Silent, Technician Says
By ROBBIE BROWN
Published: July 23, 2010
KENNER, La. — The
emergency alarm on the Deepwater Horizon was not fully
activated the day the oil rig caught fire and exploded,
killing 11 people and setting off the massive spill in
the Gulf of Mexico, a rig worker on Friday told a
government panel investigating the accident.
The worker, Mike Williams,
the rig’s chief electronics technician, said the general
safety alarm was habitually set to “inhibited” to avoid
waking up the crew with late-night sirens and emergency
lights.
“They did not want people woke up at 3 a.m. from false
alarms,” Mr. Williams told the federal panel of
investigators. Consequently, the alarm did not sound
during the emergency, leaving workers to relay
information through the loudspeaker system.
While it is not known whether it would have saved the
workers who died in the April 20 disaster, the lack of a
fully functioning alarm hampered the effort to safely
evacuate the rig, Mr. Williams said.
In a statement, Transocean, which leased the rig to BP,
said workers were allowed to set the alarm to prevent it
“from sounding unnecessarily when one of the hundreds of
local alarms activates for what could be a minor issue
or a non-emergency.”
“It was not a safety oversight or done as a matter of
convenience,” the company said. Transocean also pointed
to a separate audit of the rig in early April, in which
inspectors testing the fire detection system found no
detectors inhibited.
A six-member panel is investigating the disaster that
unleashed the largest oil spill in United States history.
At hearings this week here, crew members have described
repeated failures in the weeks before the disaster,
including power losses, computer crashes and leaking
emergency equipment.
The rig’s history of mechanical errors was documented in
a confidential audit conducted by BP seven months before
the explosion and reviewed by The New York Times.
According to the September 2009 document, four BP
officials discovered that Transocean, the rig’s owner,
had left 390 repairs undone, including many that were
“high priority,” and would require a total of more than
3,500 hours of labor. It is unclear how many of the
problems remained by the day of the catastrophe.
The 60-page audit found that previously reported errors
had been ignored by Transocean. “Consequently, a number
of the recommendations that Transocean had indicated as
closed out had either deteriorated again or not been
suitably addressed in the first place,” investigators
wrote.
In a statement, BP said it had expected Transocean to
take the audit seriously. “The goal is to have the
contractor address all safety critical items in a prompt
manner,” the statement said. “As we have previously said,
the Deepwater Horizon tragedy had multiple potential
causes, including equipment failure.”
During Friday’s hearing, witnesses addressed the role
that shortcuts and mistakes played in compounding the
rig’s troubles.
An engineering expert told investigators that the crew
members had incorrectly performed a critical test of
emergency equipment and did not detect a dangerous
“kick” of gas roughly an hour before the explosion.
John R. Smith, a petroleum engineering professor at
Louisiana State University, told investigators that rig
data showed crew members had failed to correctly test
the pressure in the well.
“The reality is it’s not a test at all, in my opinion,”
Mr. Smith testified, after reviewing records of the
crew’s actions. For months, survivors and Transocean
officials have maintained that the well pressure test
had been properly conducted.
Mr. Williams, who filed a lawsuit against Transocean in
federal court in New Orleans on April 29, added several
new details about the equipment on the rig, testifying
that another Transocean official had turned a critical
system for removing dangerous gas from the drilling
shack to “bypass mode.”
When Mr. Williams questioned that decision, he said he
was reprimanded.
“No, the damn thing’s been in bypass for five years,” he
recalled being told by Mark Hay, the subsea supervisor.
“Why’d you even mess with it?”
Mr. Williams recalled that Mr. Hay added, “The entire
fleet runs them in ‘bypass.’ ”
Oil spill cleanup aid
from overseas comes with a price tag.
The State Department confirmed that nearly every offer
of equipment or expertise
from a foreign government since the April 20 oil rig
explosion would require the
U.S. to reimburse that country.The State Department
confirmed that nearly every offer of equipment or
expertise from a foreign government since the April 20
oil rig explosion would require the U.S. to reimburse
that country.
The State Department confirmed that nearly every offer
of equipment or expertise
from a foreign government since the April 20 oil rig
explosion would require the
U.S. to reimburse that country.
The offers reveal a hard truth about the United States'
international friendships: With the U.S. widely regarded
as the world's wealthiest nation, there is a double
standard regarding foreign aid after a crisis,
especially with offers from relatively poor countries.
U.S. disaster aid is almost always free of charge; other
nations expect the U.S. to pay for help.
"These offers are not typically offers of aid," said Lt.
Erik Halvorson, a Coast Guard spokesman. "Normally, they
are offers to sell resources to BP or the U.S.
government."
Only Mexico, with wide swaths of poverty among its
population, offered the U.S. anything for free. It said
it would give the U.S. government some containment boom.
BP separately purchased 13,780 feet of boom and two
skimmers from Mexico in early May, according to the
State Department.
"We're not disappointed," State Department spokesman
Mark Toner said Friday. "We're quite pleased with the
international offers of assistance. What we're concerned
with right now is getting these types of assistance as
they become available, as they are useful to our cleanup
operations, getting them into action so they can clean
up the Gulf."
The offers include:
Britain, America's closest ally and headquarters to
London-based BP, said it would sell chemical dispersants
and containment boom for use cleaning up the spill.
London's mayor, Boris Johnson, has previously complained
about what he called "buck-passing and name-calling" in
the U.S. against BP.
Russia, which received $70.5 million in U.S. aid last
year and $78 million in 2008, said it could send boom,
oil containers and ships if the U.S. paid for them.
China offered containment boom for a price. When a major
earthquake struck in northwest China in April, the U.S.
quickly gave $100,000 for relief supplies, and after
another major earthquake in southwestern China in 2008,
the U.S. donated $500,000 through the U.S. embassy in
Beijing to the Red Cross to buy and deliver emergency
supplies there. Congressional researchers estimate the
U.S. spends roughly $30 million on foreign aid to China
each year, including educational exchanges and health
programs.
Israel, which receives roughly $3 billion in U.S.
military aid and other assistance, also said it would
send containment boom, if the U.S. paid for it.
France offered to send chemical dispersants and
equipment to clean oil off birds but only for a price.
Kenya, which received more than $24 million in U.S. aid
last year and $11 million in 2008 for humanitarian aid,
offered to send fire boom but only if the Obama
administration paid.
Vietnam offered a ship with oil-collecting sweep arms if
the U.S. paid for it. The U.S. spent $102 million in all
types of aid to Vietnam in 2008. When Typhoon Ketsana
hit that country last fall, affecting 3 million people,
the U.S. spent $100,000 on relief operations.
Romania made a "general offer of support" but asked the
U.S. government for payment. After heavy rains sent in
July 2008 sent four major rivers over their banks and
killed five people, the U.S. gave $50,000 for emergency
supplies.
Croatia offered to send technical experts and plans, for
a price. The U.S. gave Croatia $50,000 to buy local
firefighting equipment in 2007 when more than 800
wildfires broke out during an unusually hot and dry
summer.
Eileen Sullivan and Matthew Lee of The
Associated Press wrote this report.
Dear Bent,
Thank you for signing our letter to the
President's National Ocean Council calling for
an end to all new drilling and the establishment
of marine reserves.
One year on, the BP Deepwater disaster continues
to be felt in the Gulf of Mexico. That's why
Greenpeace has been working with independent
scientists from universities around the country
to find out what has really happened to the oil,
and what the long term impacts will be on this
critical, fragile ecosystem. This work included
a ship tour of the Gulf last year and we have
lots of amazing footage from the expedition.
We've also been working to expose the truth
behind the response to the disaster from both
the government and BP and have launched a new
website with thousands of documents related to
the BP disaster.
Check out what we've been up to by visiting our
special webpage --
"BP Oil Spill: One Year
Later." Thanks again for all
you do.
Sincerely,
John Hocevar
Greenpeace Oceans Campaign Director
April 20. 2011 |
|